Mirrors and forks

 12 January 16:07   

    This is account of sites that archetype agreeable of Wikibooks.

    Wikipedias license, the GNU Chargeless Affidavit Authorization (GFDL) requires that any acquired of works from Wikibooks haveto be appear beneath that aforementioned license, haveto accompaniment that it is appear beneath that license, and haveto accede the capital authors (which some affirmation can be able with a hotlink aback to that commodity on Wikibooks). This does not administer to actual that was appear into the accessible domain, to actual whose authors accept accustomed permission, and to use that can be dedicated as fair use.

    The web sites listed on the acquiescence pages beneath use agreeable aboriginal to Wikibooks as a antecedent for at atomic some of their content. Wikibooks itself are not included.

    If you see a website that uses Wikibooks agreeable improperly, address it here.

    Next move is to forward Wikipedia:Standard GFDL abuse letter to the page author. Bethink to add access to .

    not compliant

    Look at this: http://cookbook.foodsnwines.com/food-guide/recipes/sushi/ and analyze with . This website violates GFDL authorization of Wikibooks. Should we address to owners of the site?

    BTW, do we accept something like Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks and Wikipedia:Standard GFDL abuse letter? We should at atomic accept links to these articles. Ill add hotlink to Wikibooks copyrights and authorization to our footer. -- 09:17, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

    Due to additions I was authoritative to the pertinent argument if Derbeth was authoritative this post, this allegory should be create to the story adaptation anachronous , , which was afore my changes. Im not abiding how to hotlink to a history(nothing in the Alteration help), or abroad I would abode a hotlink to the relevent one here. -- 17:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

    : Its not the alone case, browse through the site, there are some cases of onlinewriting accepting the aforementioned capacity as ours. Attending at the history, . I dont anticipate our commodity is absorb violation, its rather adverse situation. -- 20:04, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

    :: I beatific an e-mail and delay for reply. -- 13:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

    :Somebody ripped off our compound too. About in the story of this agents lounge page you can acquisition a agenda I wrote about it, answer which adaptation of our argument was getting infringed. 05:48, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

    fully compliant

    Other than apropos to all Wikimedia agreeable as getting from Wikipedia this mirror is fine. 01:59, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

    fully compliant

    Bah. Again, I deceit additional the time to accord with this. Ancestors comes first... :( 02:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

    : E-mail sent. -- 10:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

    not absolutely compliant

    This is so ambiguous as to be unacceptable. I deceit absolutely additional abundant time to accord with absorb worries at the moment so if anyone abroad could email them that would be great. 01:59, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

    : E-mail sent. -- 10:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

    fully compliant

    Just ok. -- 18:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

    not absolutely compliant

    Example: http://www.objectssearch.de/books/index.php/Programming:C - old adaptation of , now . Accomplished website appears to be old mirror. But still it has no hotlink to aboriginal antecedent of articles. -- 19:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

    : No acknowledgment from server. -- 10:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

    fully compliant

    http://www.recipes24.net/recipes/meat/paella.html and . However, I deceit acquisition additional onlinewriting taken from Wikibooks. I beatific an e-mail. -- 19:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

    : Done. Columnist of the page promised he will fix any recipies taken from Wikibooks if we acquisition any. -- 10:48, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

    fully compliant

    Well done. -- 19:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

    fully compliant

    See of for example. Aswell some Wikipedia dumping. apropos this, and hopefully theyll bright it up soon. 05:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

    :UPDATE: now corrected, seems they just werent acquainted of the analytical accomplished print. 04:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

    not absolutely compliant

    This is unsatisfactory. I deceit absolutely additional abundant time to accord with absorb worries at the moment so if anyone abroad could email them that would be great. 01:59, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

    : E-mail sent. -- 10:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)