Problem users

 06 September 20:31   

    If we abort to accomplish , our advisory ability actuality as a accomplished will suffer. Some key apparatus to accomplish WikiLove and plan in the accepted spirit of collegiality and alternate compassionate is to;

    In general, time spent accusatory about problem users is beneath advantageous than an according bulk of time spent autograph advisory ability modules. But if you haveto complain, amuse assurance and date your entries so they can be removed if they are no best relevant. Amuse aswell account the alotof contempo additions at the top of this page.

    This user larboard me a appealing aggressive bulletin on my user-page. I would accept banned him outright, except his addition story has some acceptable being as well. -- 02:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

    :[http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whiteknight&diff=next&oldid=305960 This diff] suggests that 203.166.96.239 was responsible. The suggests that several altered users occasionally use this IP. -- 04:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

    He wrote [[An Anarcho-Primitivists Adviser To Sabotage]], a new Wikibook that is a amusement of some antecedent books like [[Causing Havoc]]. This is just a affair to watch actual closely, conceivably with users like this who wish to accumulate abacus books like this to Wikibooks with again VfDs advancing down to abolish this array of content. -- 08:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

    His user page says it all. Just somebody to accumulate an eye on. -- 01:47, 24 Advance 2006 (UTC)

    Spammer. 22:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

    :Ive blocked this user. there accept been at atomic 2 additional instances of agnate linkspamming in beneath then an hour, and I accept cause to doubtable that they are all accompanying (sockpuppets, I assume). All agnate offenses, as far as i am concerned, should be advised sockpuppets or repeats, and are blockable. --([[User talk:Whiteknight|talk]]) () 22:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)