Armament of attributes

 28 June 02:55   

    =Forces of attributes =

    If asked how some types of armament exist, some humans alpha counting on their fingers, and if the calculation exceeds ten, they answer

    plenty of. Indeed, there are gravitational armament , electrical, magnetic, elastic, frictional forces, and aswell armament of wind, of

    expanding steam, of application muscles, etc.

    If, however, we assay the basis causes of all these forces, we can abate their amount to just a few axiological armament (or axiological interactions, as physicists say).

    For example, the adaptable force of a continued elastic bond is due to the allure amid the molecules that the elastic is create of.

    Looking deeper, we acquisition that the molecules allure anniversary additional because of the electromagnetic allure amid the electrons of

    one atom and nuclei of the other. Similarly, if we abase a section of rubber, it resists because the molecules debris to approach

    each additional too abutting due to the electric abhorrence of the nuclei. Accordingly the animation of elastic has the electromagnetic origin.

    Any additional force in the animal apple can be analyzed in the aforementioned manner. Afterwards accomplishing this, we will acquisition that all armament that we see

    around us (in the macroworld), are either of gravitational or electromagnetic nature. As we aswell know, in the microworld there are

    two additional types of forces: The able (nuclear) armament that act amid all hadrons, and the anemic armament that are amenable for

    changing the quark flavors.

    Therefore, all interactions in the Cosmos are absolute by alone four axiological forces: Strong, electromagnetic, anemic and

    gravitational. These armament are actual altered in backbone and range. Their about strengths are accustomed in Table 15.5. The alotof able is the nuclear

    interaction. The backbone of the electromagnetic armament is one hundred times lower. The anemic armament are nine orders of magnitude

    weaker than the nuclear forces, and the force is 38 orders of consequence weaker! It is amazing that this attenuate alternation governs

    the catholic processes. The cause is that the gravitational armament are of continued ambit and consistently attractive. There is no such affair as

    negative accumulation that would awning the gravitational field, like abrogating electrons awning the acreage of absolute nuclei.

    

    | align=CENTER | Actual Short

    |-

    | align=CENTER | Gravitational

    | align=CENTER | $10^$

    | align=CENTER | Long

    |}

    Physicists consistently try to abridge things. Back there are alone four axiological forces, it is appetizing to ask If alone four, then why

    not alone one?. Can it be that all interactions are just altered faces of one adept force?

    The first who started the adventure for affinity of armament was Einstein. Afterwards commutual his accepted approach of relativity, he

    spent 30 years in bootless attempts to arrange the electromagnetic and force forces. At that time, it seemed analytic because both of

    them were absolute in ambit and obeyed the aforementioned changed aboveboard law. Einstein bootless because the affinity should be done on the basis

    of breakthrough laws, but he approved to do it using the classical concepts.

    Now it is accepted that admitting the similarities in anatomy of the force and electromagnetic forces, the force will be the endure to crop to

    unification. The added doubtful affinity of the electromagnetic and anemic armament angry out to be the first acknowledged move appear the

    unified interaction.

    In 1979, the Nobel cost was awarded to Weinberg, Salam, and Glashow, who developed a unified approach of electromagnetic and weak

    interactions. According to that theory, the electromagnetic and anemic armament assemble to one electro-weak alternation at actual high

    collision energies. The approach aswell predicted the actuality of abundant particles, the $W$ and $Z$, with masses about 80000MeV and

    90000MeV, respectively. These particles were apparent in 1983, which brought beginning analysis to the new theory.

    The next move was to try to amalgamate the electro-weak approach with the approach of the able interactions (i.e. quark theory) in a single

    theory. This plan was alleged the admirable unification. Currently, physicists altercate versions of such approach that predicts the

    convergence of the three armament at clumsily top energies $sim10^$MeV. The quarks and leptons in this theory, are the

    unified leptoquarks.

    The admirable affinity is not that acknowledged as the electro-weak theory. It has the problem of algebraic bendability and

    contradicts to at atomic one experiment. The amount is that it predicts the proton decay,

    $p,longrightarrow,\; e^+\; +pi^0$,

    that does not conserve both the baryon and lepton numbers, with the lifetime of $sim10^$years. The abstracts show, however,

    that the lifetime of the proton is at atomic $10^$ years.

    Some humans accept that the admirable affinity has an inherent arch flaw. According to them, one cannot arrange the armament step

    by move (leaving the force out), and the actual way is to amalgamate all four armament in the alleged approach of everything.

    There are few altered approaches to accumulation everything. One of them suggests that all axiological particles (quarks and leptons)

    are just cavernous modes of cord loops in multidimensional space. The electron is a cord cavernous one way, the up-quark is a string

    vibrating addition way, and so on. The additional access introduces a new akin of axiological particles, the preons, that could be

    constituent locations of quarks and leptons. The adventure goes on.

    Everyone agrees that amalgam the approach of aggregate would in no way beggarly that biology, geology, chemistry, or even physics had

    been solved. The cosmos is so affluent and circuitous that the analysis of the axiological approach would not beggarly the end of science. The

    ultimate approach of aggregate would accommodate an determined colonnade of adherence always acceptable us that the cosmos is a apprehensible place.